Embodied Idealism Merleau – Ponty’s Transcendental Philosophy | 4.88 MB
Title: Embodied Idealism Merleau – Ponty’s Transcendental Philosophy
Author: JOSEPH C. BERENDZEN
Category: Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Phenomenology, Modern
Language: English | 288 Pages | ISBN: 0192874764
Description:
Embodied Idealism argues that Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s early thought – primarily as found in The Structure of Behavior and Phenomenology of Perception – stands as a form of transcendental idealism. This interpretation runs against the grain of much of the Merleau-Ponty scholarship, and opposing interpretations are not without support. Merleau-Ponty is at points highly critical of idealism in his early works. Also, his emphasis on embodiment would seem to run counter to the idealist view that the mental is central to reality. Joseph Berendzen shows that these points can be accommodated within a transcendental idealist interpretation. Merleau-Ponty’s overt criticisms of idealism are aimed at specific aspects of idealist theories that are not obligatory aspects of idealism in general. Rather, his critique is typically aimed at a specific version of intellectualist idealism associated with his teacher Léon Brunschvicg. In spite of his overt criticisms of idealism, Merleau-Ponty’s early philosophy holds that our experience is inextricably structured by our minds. Furthermore, he holds that reality is ontologically dependent on the mind, yet in a manner that also allows for a sense in which reality is mind-independent. It is crucial to this interpretation that Merleau-Ponty’s emphasis on embodiment leads to a unique view of embodied consciousness and subjectivity that supports a novel form of idealism, rather than motivating an anti-idealist position. Thus, his transcendental idealism is genuinely an embodied idealism.
Embodied Idealism argues that Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s early thought – primarily as found in The Structure of Behavior and Phenomenology of Perception – stands as a form of transcendental idealism. This interpretation runs against the grain of much of the Merleau-Ponty scholarship, and opposing interpretations are not without support. Merleau-Ponty is at points highly critical of idealism in his early works. Also, his emphasis on embodiment would seem to run counter to the idealist view that the mental is central to reality. Joseph Berendzen shows that these points can be accommodated within a transcendental idealist interpretation. Merleau-Ponty’s overt criticisms of idealism are aimed at specific aspects of idealist theories that are not obligatory aspects of idealism in general. Rather, his critique is typically aimed at a specific version of intellectualist idealism associated with his teacher Léon Brunschvicg. In spite of his overt criticisms of idealism, Merleau-Ponty’s early philosophy holds that our experience is inextricably structured by our minds. Furthermore, he holds that reality is ontologically dependent on the mind, yet in a manner that also allows for a sense in which reality is mind-independent. It is crucial to this interpretation that Merleau-Ponty’s emphasis on embodiment leads to a unique view of embodied consciousness and subjectivity that supports a novel form of idealism, rather than motivating an anti-idealist position. Thus, his transcendental idealism is genuinely an embodied idealism.
DOWNLOAD:
rapidgator.net/file/d6af49ad3844e3602dfe78f6d47889d4/Embodied_Idealism_Merleau-Pontys_Transcendental_Philosophy.rar
nitroflare.com/view/BEC18D033BC2161/Embodied_Idealism_Merleau-Pontys_Transcendental_Philosophy.rar
